X is for the Christ

    “Don’t take Christ out of Christmas.” That was commonly said decades ago within my hearing. It was back when Christmas was ubiquitous but people were starting to pull back from the religious side of it. It was back when “only ten shopping days until Christmas” did not mean that Christmas was ten days away, because not every day was a shopping day (stores were closed on Sundays). It was a different world.
    One focal point of opposition was the word “Xmas.” I heard adults railing against it: Look, they’re taking “Christ” out and replacing him with an X! Only long later did I learn that “X” is an old abbreviation for “Christ,” being the first letter of the Greek word Xristos (= Christ).
---
    It is not good to poke fun at this kind of mistake; all of us fall into these errors because none of us knows everything. It is, however, at least interesting that what looks like an effort to eradicate Christian truth might be instead a deeper encoding of it.
---
    In algebra the task is often to solve an equation for the X. What does the X equal? For what values of X would the equation be true?
    For a lot of human life, the unknown X turns out to be Jesus. Who can give rest to the weary? Who can bring peace?
    Problem: Solve the following equation for X. “X = a true human being.”
    Solution: “X = Jesus Christ.”
---
    Back in the day there was a bumper sticker: “Jesus is the answer.” I used to wonder, if that’s true then what’s the question? I now think that for just about all the serious and important questions it just is the case. Jesus is the answer.
    In the divine alphabet, X is for the Christ.
---
    Out & About. The next “Good Books & Good Talk” seminar is set for 5 p.m. on Sunday, November 28. We will discuss Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. Anyone who reads the book is welcome to the conversation.
    My sermon on All Saints, given at All Souls in Oklahoma City, is here: https://allsoulsokc.com/sermons . I try to make sense of Revelation chapter 7 (the pause in which there is a vision of the saints) in terms of the whole book: Jesus reads the scroll of history.

Saints and Sinners

The best moves I made when I was rector were often just keeping from messing things up. My parish had several special traditions, many of them quirky; all I needed to do was to keep them going. Here’s one.
    At the end of the school year—which in the great state of New York comes around Father’s Day—we had a parish picnic following the morning’s Eucharist. A softball game was part of the festivities. There were two teams, the Saints and the Sinners. But here’s the catch: you didn’t know which team you were on until the game was over. The winning team, whichever team it was, were the Saints.
---
    It seems theologically correct. In the long run the saints are the winners. Jesus as much as says so, when he affirms that “theirs is the kingdom of heaven.” They get comforted. They “inherit the earth” which is quite a different matter from inheriting the wind. Their deepest longings are for righteousness, and those longings will be satisfied. Mercy will be shown to them. They will see God face to face. Their efforts at making peace will reveal that they are God’s children. The kingdom of heaven really is theirs.
    In the game of life, in the end, the saints are the winners.
    Vice versa, the sinners are the losers. They end up without comfort, without their longings satisfied (because they longed for things that do not satisfy), without mercy, without vision, without peace. They end up “without”—i.e., outside—the kingdom of heaven.
---
    And yet, although theologically correct, it is a truth difficult to see. I just read (and would recommend) a short novel, recently translated from the Japanese: Heaven, by Mieko Kawakami. It features a boy and a girl in middle school who are bullied without mercy. I recommend it because, although it takes a strong stomach to read about the bullying, it also shows a remarkable friendship grow between them, while raising questions easily translatable into Christian thought. Should one fight back or turn the other cheek—for instance.
    In the center of the book, the boy confronts one of his tormentors. They have a difficult conversation. The tormentor turns out to be completely amoral. Asked why he beats up on him, the tormentor basically says why not. He denies he has a conscience or a sense of right and wrong, denies that there is anything in the world except people doing what they want to do and can do. The reason he is a bully is just that he can be a bully. And, turning the tables, he says that the reason the boy gets bullied is because he lets it happen.
    The boy resists this conclusion—and it’s complicated, but just barely he manages not to fall into wickedness. Or so I judge, as a reader of the book who believes there really are sins and awful deeds in the world, and there really are souls that can be lost. Nonetheless, when Jesus says “Blessed are those who hunger and thirst after righteousness,” he is saying something that is hardly obvious to many people.
    Only at the end will it become clear.
---
    Out & About. The next “Good Books & Good Talk” seminar is set for 5 p.m. on Sunday, November 28. We will discuss Lewis Carroll’sAlice’s Adventures in Wonderland.
    On the Web: The Stead Center has published another essay by me on fear, this one occasioned by crippling acts of weather, such as last February’s deep freeze. People were blaming everyone—except God. That strikes me as odd. https://www.steadcenter.com/instead/fear-and-anger/

12...69707172737475767778 ... 184185

The Rev. Canon Victor Lee Austin. Ph.D., is the Theologian-in-Residence for the diocese and is the author of several books including, "Friendship: The Heart of Being Human" and "A Post-Covid Catechesis.: